Pierce v. Flores, M.D. et al
Filing
29
ORDER Addressing 28 Declaration signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/2/2011. (Jessen, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
AARON JAMES PIERCE,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01508-SKO PC
ORDER ADDRESSING DECLARATION
v.
(Doc. 28)
DR. E. FLORES, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
Plaintiff Aaron James Pierce, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis,
16
filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 20, 2010. On May 25, 2011,
17
Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address in which he also included a declaration setting forth
18
problems he is encountering regarding requests for assistance from his parole officer and in obtaining
19
permanent housing.
20
This action is confined to Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims of inadequate medical care
21
while he was incarcerated at North Kern State Prison in Delano, California, and the Court lacks
22
jurisdiction to address Plaintiff’s current situation. Summers v. Earth Island Institute, 555 U.S. 488,
23
___, 129 S.Ct. 1142, 1149 (2009); Mayfield v. United States, 599 F.3d 964, 969 (9th Cir. 2010).
24
Plaintiff is residing in Oxnard, California, and while the Court expresses no opinion whether
25
Plaintiff has any viable claims for relief based on his current situation, those claims would have to
26
be brought in the Central District of California in any event.
27
///
28
1
1
Accordingly, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s declaration, but Plaintiff has no standing in
2
this action to seek relief remedying his current situation and his declaration is therefore deemed
3
addressed by the issuance of this order.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
ie14hj
June 2, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
