(SS) Em v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2010cv01414 - Document 29 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS That Plaintiff's Application for an Award of EAJA Fees Be Granted in the Amount of $3,476.34 28 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/23/12. (Hellings, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(SS) Em v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAVUTH EM, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) _____________________________________ ) 1:10-cv-01414-LJO-SKO ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR AN AWARD OF EAJA FEES BE GRANTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,476.34 (Doc. 28) 16 17 On March 2, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 18 Plaintiff's application for an award of fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") be 19 granted in the amount of $3,476.34. (Doc. 28.) These Findings and Recommendations were served 20 on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within 21 15 days after service of the order. No objections were filed. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 23 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the 24 Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. 27 The Findings and Recommendations issued on March 2, 2012, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Plaintiff's application for an award of attorneys' fees is GRANTED in the amount of 2 $3,476.34: 3 a. Plaintiff is awarded $1,575.54 for time expended by Ms. Bosavanh, Esq.; 4 b. Plaintiff is awarded $1,900.80 for time expended by Mr. Wilborn, Esq.; and 5 3. Plaintiff shall be paid in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 66h44d March 23, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
