Max L. Reinig v. Parker et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/2/2011. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Lowell T. Carruth, # 034065 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP P.O. Box 28912 5 River Park Place East Fresno, CA 93720-1501 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants METRO XPRESS and DALE PARKER 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 MAX L. REINIG, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 Case No.: 1:10-CV-01232-LJO-SKO STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION v. DALE PARKER, individually; METRO XPRESS, a Kansas Corporation doing business in the State of California, and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff MAX L. REINIG (“Plaintiff”) 20 and Defendants METRO XPRESS and DALE PARKER (“Defendants”) by and through their 21 counsels of record. 1. 22 The parties hereby agree and stipulate that Plaintiff’s Complaint and the entire 23 action, is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney’s 24 fees and costs. 25 The parties, by the undersigned counsel for each party, agree that this Stipulation may be 26 signed by counsel, and that all counsel listed below have authorized the submission of this 27 Stipulation to this Court. 28 /// MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 32609/00063-1736933.v1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 2 3 Dated: June 2, 2011 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 4 By: Lowell T. Carruth Attorneys for Defendants METRO XPRESS and DALE PARKER 5 6 7 8 /s/ And Dated: June 2, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF FRANK G. BLUNDO 9 10 By: /s/ Frank G. Blundo, Jr Attorneys for Plaintiff MAX L. REINIG 11 12 13 14 ORDER 15 Having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint and the entire action 16 with prejudice, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff’s Complaint 17 and the entire action is dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety, each party to bear their own 18 attorney’s fees and costs. The clerk is directed to close this action. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 2, 2011 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 66h44d 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 32609/00063-1736933.v1 2 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?