Jackson v. Palombo et al
Filing
29
ORDER STRIKING UNSIGNED FILING as to 27 Motion to Amend the Complaint and Requiring Plaintiff to File Response to Motion to Dismiss within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/30/2011. (Martin-Gill, S)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
RICHARD JACKSON,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01129-SKO PC
ORDER STRIKING UNSIGNED FILING AND
REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE
TO MOTION TO DISMISS WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
v.
MIKE PALOMBO, et al.,
(Doc. 27)
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff Richard Jackson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this
16
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 23, 2010. On October 26, 2011, Defendants
17
Meza, Niino, and Palombo filed a motion to dismiss. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. On November 28, 2011,
18
Plaintiff filed what he entitled a motion to amend but what appears to be a response to the motion
19
to dismiss. However, Plaintiff neglected to sign the filing and the Court cannot consider unsigned
20
filings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); Local Rule 131.
21
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s filing is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.
22
Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within which to file a response
23
to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
i0d3h8
November 30, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
