-GBC (PC) Bussiere v. Cano et al, No. 1:2010cv00945 - Document 100 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 86 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Denying 58 71 Motions for Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 08/15/2012. (Flores, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-GBC (PC) Bussiere v. Cano et al Doc. 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR T. BUSSIERE, CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00945-AWI-GBC (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 12 v. 13 CANO, et al., 14 Docs. 58, 71, 86 Defendants. 15 / 16 17 On May 26, 2010, Plaintiff Arthur T. Bussiere (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro 18 se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was 19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 20 302. 21 On October 17, 2011 and January 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed motions for preliminary injunction 22 against prison officials at Corcoran State Prison for retaliation by prison officials who are not parties 23 to this action. Docs. 58, 71. On April 17,2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and 24 Recommendations recommending denying Plaintiff’s Motions for Injunctive Relief. On May 11, 25 2012, Plaintiff filed Objections. Doc. 87. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 27 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 28 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 and 2. 5 6 The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 17, 2012, are ADOPTED, in full; Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction, filed October 17, 2011 and January 26, 2012, are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: 0m8i78 August 15, 2012 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
