Baltimore v. Haggins
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/16/2011 disregarding 19 Reply to Answer filed by Robert Baltimore. (Lundstrom, T)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT BALTIMORE,
12
13
Case No. 1:10-cv-00931 OWW JLT (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S ANSWER
vs.
(Doc. 19)
14
15
CHRISTOPHER HAGGINS,
Defendant.
16
/
17
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On June 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s
19
Answer and Opposition for a Summary Judgment.” Plaintiff is advised that a response to Defendant’s
20
answer is unnecessary. Plaintiff is also advised that Defendant has yet to file a motion for summary
21
judgment. The Court, therefore, will disregard Plaintiff’s June 15, 2011 filing.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: June 16, 2011
9j7khi
25
26
27
28
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
