Shepard v. Bass et al
Filing
28
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 22 , THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/21/11. (Hellings, J)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LAMONT SHEPARD,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00754-LJO-SMS PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS
v.
BASS, et al.,
13
(ECF No. 22)
Defendants.
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
/
14
15
Plaintiff Lamont Shepard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on
17
Plaintiff’s complaint, filed April 30, 2010, against Defendants Bass and Miranda for excessive force
18
in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
19
20
On April 29, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition
or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).
21
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1.
23
motion to dismiss within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order; and
24
2.
25
The failure to respond to Defendants’ motion in compliance with this order will
result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
26
27
Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411
June 21, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
