Delgado v. Mann Brothers Fuel Inc., No. 1:2010cv00720 - Document 45 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting 42 Findings and Recommendations, signed by Senior Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/14/12. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 DANIEL DELGADO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. MANN BROTHERS FUEL, Inc., Defendant. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10cv0720 AWI DLB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Document 42) On August 2, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 18 Defendant be found in contempt and that compensatory sanctions be awarded. The Findings and 19 Recommendations were served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that 20 any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of the order. Over 21 fourteen (14) days have passed and no objections have been filed. 22 23 24 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 26 27 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 3 1. FULL; 4 5 The Findings and Recommendations issued August 2, 2012, are ADOPTED IN 2. Defendant is found in CONTEMPT and sanctions SHALL BE AWARDED in the 6 amount of the attorneys’ fees and costs incurred as a result of Defendant’s failure 7 to comply with the Court’s Orders dated April 23, 2012, and June 8, 2012; and 8 3. Plaintiff SHALL submit a declaration, within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this order, setting forth the attorneys’ fees and costs incurred as a result 9 10 of Defendant’s failure to comply with the Court’s Orders dated April 23, 2012, 11 and June 8, 2012. 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 14, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 DEAC_Signature-END: 18 0m8i788 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.