Jerry Cobb v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers et al
Filing
25
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff To File Response To Defendants' Motion To Dismiss (ECF No. 23 ), Thirty-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/24/2011. (Responses due by 7/29/2011)(Fahrney, E)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JERRY COBB,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00642-LJO-SMS PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS
v.
KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, et al.,
13
(ECF No. 23)
Defendants.
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
/
14
15
Plaintiff Jerry Cobb, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil
16
rights action on May 24, 2010, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s
17
complaint against Defendants Chastagner, Mendoza-Powers, and Reynolds for violations of the First
18
Amendment and the Religious Land use and Institutionalized Persons Act. .
19
20
On May 23, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition
or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).
21
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1.
23
motion to dismiss within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order; and
24
2.
25
The failure to respond to Defendants’ motion in compliance with this order will
result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
26
27
Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411
June 24, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
