Wiley v. Ralls et al, No. 1:2010cv00506 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending to DISMISS 1 COMPLAINT with Prejudice, Objections to F&R due by 6/3/2010 - signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/20/2010. (Leon-Guerrero, A)

Download PDF
Wiley v. Ralls et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY WILEY, SR., 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. RALLS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv-00506-AWI-JLT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On 19 April 12, 2010, Plaintiff filed a new application to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to the 20 order of the Court. (Doc. 6). As requested by the Court, Plaintiff provided information in this 21 amended motion about the value of his residence and his tools. He reported also that he received 22 Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits and has received these benefits since 1986. 23 However, Plaintiff failed to disclose the amount of SSI benefits he receives on a monthly basis 24 or the amount that he expects he will continue to receive. In addition, although Plaintiff stated 25 that his wife was dependent upon him for support, he failed to indicate the amount of support he 26 is required to provide her or explain why he must provide this support. Plaintiff failed to disclose 27 also whether his spouse receives income and/or is receiving public benefits. Finally, Plaintiff did 28 not explain the source of the income that he will use to pay for the $140,000 home that he stated 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 was currently under construction. On April 14, 2010, the Court detailed these deficiencies in his motion to proceed in forma 3 pauperis and ordered Plaintiff to submit a new complete, signed application or alternatively, pay 4 the $350 filing fee. (Doc. 8). The Court granted Plaintiff 30 days to comply. (Id.) The Court 5 expressly warned Plaintiff that his failure to timely comply with the order would result in a 6 recommendation that this action be dismissed. 7 8 Plaintiff was required to file his amended motion by May 17, 2010. Nevertheless, Plaintiff has failed to respond to the order. 9 RECOMMENDATION 10 Based on the foregoing, the Court recommends, 11 1. That the complaint (Doc. 1) be DISMISSED, with prejudice, for 12 failure to comply with the Court’s order to file a new motion to 13 proceed in forma pauperis or, alternatively, to pay the filing fee. 14 These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 15 assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 304 of the 16 Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. 17 Within 14 days after being served with a copy, Plaintiffs may file written objections with the 18 Court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 19 Recommendations.” The District Judge will then review the Magistrate Judge’s ruling pursuant 20 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the 21 right to appeal the District Judge’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: May 20, 2010 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.