Amps v. Ayon et al
Filing
11
ORDER Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants Following Receipt of Plaintiff's Notice of Willingness to Procees Only on Cognizable Eight Amendment Claim Against Defendants Ayon and Pelayo, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/2/11. Defendants Escalante, Wiles, Manion, Ramirez, and Does 1 through 35 are dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims against them. (Verduzco, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LOUIS THOMAS AMPS,
10
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00395-AWI-SKO PC
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS
AND DEFENDANTS FOLLOWING RECEIPT
OF PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF WILLINGNESS
TO PROCEED ONLY ON COGNIZABLE
EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM AGAINST
DEFENDANTS AYON AND PELAYO
J. AYON, et al.,
13
Defendants.
(Docs. 1, 8 and 9)
14
/
15
Plaintiff Louis Thomas Amps, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
16
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 on March 8, 2010. On May 13, 2011,
17
the Magistrate Judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it stated an Eighth Amendment
18
claim against Defendants Ayon and Pelayo for failing to protect him, but it did not state a claim
19
based on the failure of Defendants to investigate the attack on Plaintiff, a substantive due process
20
claim, an equal protection claim, a section 1985 claim, or a First Amendment claim, and it did not
21
state any claims against Defendants Escalante, Wiles, Manion, Ramirez, and Does 1 through 35. 28
22
U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff was ordered to either file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his
23
willingness to proceed only on his Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants Ayon and Pelayo.
24
On May 25, 2011, Plaintiff notified the Court that he is willing to proceed only against Defendants
25
Ayon and Pelayo.
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Magistrate Judge’s screening order, and
2
Plaintiff’s notice of willingness to proceed only on his cognizable claim, it is HEREBY ORDERED
3
that:
4
1.
This action for damages shall proceed on Plaintiff’s complaint, filed March 8, 2010,
5
against Defendants Ayon and Pelayo for failing to protect Plaintiff, in violation of the
6
Eighth Amendment;
7
2.
Plaintiff’s claim for failure to investigate, substantive due process claim, equal
8
protection claim, section 1985 claim, First Amendment claim, and claim for
9
equitable relief are dismissed for failure to state a claim; and
10
3.
11
Defendants Escalante, Wiles, Manion, Ramirez, and Does 1 through 35 are dismissed
based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any claims against them.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated:
0m8i78
June 2, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
