Franklin v. Patterson et al

Filing 4

INFORMATIONAL ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/4/2010. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 EMERY L. FRANKLIN III, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 WESTON REID PATTERSON, et al., 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 INFORMATIONAL ORDER TO PRO SE PRISONER LITIGANTS 17 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. In 18 litigating this action, the parties must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed. R. 19 Civ. P.) and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California 20 (Local Rules). This order highlights specific rules of which the parties should take particular 21 note. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL RULES, FEDERAL RULES OR A 22 COURT ORDER, INCLUDING THIS ORDER, WILL BE GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL OR 23 OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 1. Documents intended to be filed with the court must be mailed to the Clerk of the 25 Court. See Local Rule 133(d)(1). All documents improperly mailed to a judge's chambers will 26 27 28 1 ) 1:10cv0367 OWW DLB ) ) ) INFORMATIONAL ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) be stricken from the record.1 A document requesting a court order must be styled as a motion, W h e n a document is stricken, it becomes a nullity and is not considered by the court for any purposes. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 not a letter. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7. 2. Each document submitted for filing must include the original signature of the filing party or parties. Local Rule 131; Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). All documents submitted without the required signature(s) will be stricken. Each separate document must be bound separately at the top left corner. Local Rule 130(b). If a document is bound behind another document, it will not be filed and will not be entered on the court docket. Documents submitted to the court may be either typewritten or handwritten, but must be legible, and writing shall be on one (1) side of the page only. Local Rule 130. 3. All documents filed with the court must be submitted with an additional legible conformed copy for the court's use. Local rule 133 (d)(2). If the filing party wishes the court to return a file-stamped copy, he or she must include an additional copy for that purpose AND a pre-addressed postage paid envelope. The court cannot provide copy or mailing service for a party, even for an indigent plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis. 4. After defendants have appeared in an action by filing a pleading responsive to the complaint (i.e., an answer or a motion to dismiss), all documents filed with the court must include a certificate of service stating that a copy of the document was served on the opposing party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5; Local Rule 135. A document submitted without the required proof of service will be stricken. Where a party is represented, service on the party's attorney of record constitutes effective service. 5. All filings must bear the file number assigned to the action, followed by the initials of the District Court Judge and the Magistrate Judge to whom the case is assigned. Where plaintiff simultaneously pursues more than one action, he or she must file separate original documents and the appropriate number of copies in each action to which the document pertains. Documents submitted listing more than one case number in the caption will be stricken. 6. The court cannot serve as a repository for the parties' evidence (i.e., prison or medical records, witness affidavits, etc.). The parties may not file evidence with the court until the course of litigation brings the evidence into question (for example, on a motion for summary judgment, at trial, or when requested by the court). Evidence improperly submitted to the court will be 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 stricken and returned to the party. 7. No discovery may be conducted until an answer is filed and the court issues an order opening discovery. Discovery propounded on a party is self-executing, and must be served directly on the party from whom discovery is sought; parties should not file copies of their discovery with the court. See Local Rules 250.1-250.5. Discovery documents inappropriately submitted to the court will be stricken. Where the response to discovery is unsatisfactory, the party seeking discovery may file a motion to compel discovery, including a copy of the discovery propounded and the response thereto. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. 8. Along with the discovery order, the Court will set scheduling dates for the close of discovery and pretrial motion activities, for pretrial conference, and for trial. Because plaintiff is incarcerated and proceeds pro se, all pretrial motions will be submitted without a hearing. See Local Rule 230(l). The parties are referred to Local Rule 230(l) for the briefing schedule on motions and motion activities. 9. All court deadlines will be strictly enforced. Requests for time extensions must state the reason the extension is needed and must be filed with the court before the deadline in question. Local Rule 144. 10. A pro se plaintiff has an affirmative duty to keep the court and opposing parties apprised of his or her address. If a plaintiff moves and fails to file a notice of change of address, service of court orders at plaintiff's prior address shall constitute effective notice. See Local Rule 182(f). If mail directed to plaintiff is returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable, the court will not attempt to remail it. If the address is not updated within sixty days of the mail being returned, the action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a March 4, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?