Mireya Manquero et al. v. Ametek Incorporated
Filing
8
ORDER RE: Stipulation of the Parties Extending Time of Defendant Ametek to file Answer, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/29/2010. (Kusamura, W)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
FEDERICO CASTELAN SAYRE, ESQ., SBN 067420 TYLER R. DOWDALL, ESQ., SBN 258950 SAYRE & LEVITT, LLP 900 N. BROADWAY, 4th FLOOR SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701-3452 Phone (714) 550-9117 Facsimile (714) 550-9125 Attorneys for Plaintiffs:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MIREYA MANQUERO, individually and as successor in interest to the Estate of Anthony Manquero; DAMIAN MANQUERO, individually and as successor in interest to the Estate of Anthony Manquero; ANTONIO MANQUERO, individually and as successor in interest to the Estate of Anthony Manquero; FRANCISCO MANQUERO, individually and as successor in interest to the Estate of Anthony Manquero; ESTATE OF ANTHONY MANQUERO, by and through its successors in interest, MIREYA MANQUERO, DAMIAN MANQUERO, ANTONIO MANQUERO, FRANCISCO MANQUERO. Plaintiffs, v. AMETEK INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 110, inclusive, Defendants. ______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00304-OWW-SMS ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES EXTENDING TIME OF DEFENDANT AMETEK TO FILE ANSWER
COME NOW, the Parties herein, by and through their respective counsel of record, Tyler R. Dowdall, Esq., SAYRE & LEVITT, LLP, for Plaintiffs MIREYA
1 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
Law Offices of: Sayre & Levitt, LLP
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MANQUERO, FRANCISCO DETERT,
DAMIAN MANQUERO, AND
MANQUERO, ESTATE ARNOLD, OF LLP,
ANTONIO ANTHONY for
MANQUERO, MANQUERO, AMETEK
(hereinafter collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Gregory C. Read, Esq., SEDGWICK, MORAN Defendant INCORPORATED, (hereinafter "Defendant") and, with the authority of their respective clients, stipulate as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED as follows: 1. 2. 3. The parties have met and conferred regarding the filing of a responsive As represented by Defense counsel, his schedule is restricted as a result of Due to an administrative error, an outmoded form for acknowledging receipt pleading; trial and travel commitments; of summons was used which makes reference to a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure that no longer exists; 4. Defendant AMETEK INCORPORATED shall have 60 days from date of service of Summons and Complaint on March 24, 2010 to file a responsive pleading; 5. It is further agreed by and between the parties that this stipulation may be signed in counterpart and that a facsimile or electronic signature will be as valid as an original signature.
DATED: March 25, 2010
SAYRE & LEVITT, LLP
By: _/s/ Tyler R. Dowdall, Esquire Federico C. Sayre Tyler R. Dowdall Attorneys for Plaintiffs
2
Law Offices of: Sayre & Levitt, LLP
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED: March 25, 2010
SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD, LLP By: /s/ Gregory C. Read, Esquire Gregory C. Read Attorneys Defendants
ORDER The parties having stipulated that Defendant shall have 60 days from receipt of summons and complaint to file a responsive pleading, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 29, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Law Offices of: Sayre & Levitt, LLP
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
