Munoz v. People of California
Filing
5
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Wny Petition Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure to Comply With a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/4/10: Petitioner's Show Cause Response due by 6/7/2010.(Hellings, J)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 CARLOS ALBERT MUNOZ, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
U . S . D is t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia cd
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ) PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________) 1:10-CV-00206 GSA HC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 10, 2010, a court order was issued in this case wherein Petitioner was directed to file a completed consent/decline form within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. Thirty days passed and Petitioner did not comply. On March 29, 2010, a second order was issued directing Petitioner to complete and submit a consent/decline form within thirty (30) days. Those thirty days have now passed and Petitioner has not complied. Local Rule 110 provides: "Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." Accordingly, Petitioner is HEREBY ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, within fourteen (14) 1
1 2 3 4 5
days of service of this order, why the petition should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij
May 4, 2010
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
U . S . D is t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia cd
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
