Thomas v. The Superior Court of Madera County
Filing
7
ORDER To SHOW CAUSE Why Petition Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure To Comply With A Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/4/2010. Show Cause Response due by 6/7/2010.(Scrivner, E)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 RAYSHON THOMAS, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 20 On February 9, 2010, a court order was issued in this case wherein Petitioner was directed to 21 file a completed consent/decline form within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. On 22 February 25, 2010, the order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. Petitioner was 23 re-served with the order on March 29, 2010. Thirty (30) days have again passed and Petitioner has 24 not complied. 25 Local Rule 110 provides: "Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with 26 any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions 27 authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." 28
U . S . D is t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia cd
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MADERA ) COUNTY, ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________) 1:10-CV-00200 GSA HC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 6i0kij 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
U . S . D is t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia cd
Accordingly, Petitioner is HEREBY ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, within thirty (30) days of service of this order, why the petition should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
May 4, 2010
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
