(PC) Brown v. Pickett et al, No. 1:2010cv00167 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion 21 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/23/11. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
(PC) Brown v. Pickett et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ALFRED BROWN, CASE NO. 1:10-CV-00167-AWI-DLB PC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 11 v. 12 CHARLES D. PICKETT, et al., (DOC. 21) 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff Alfred Brown (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 17 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 28, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for the 18 Court to order Pleasant Valley State Prison to release his property. Doc. 20. The Court treats the 19 motion as one for preliminary injunction. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On August 4, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was 22 served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and 23 Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. Doc. 21. Plaintiff did not file a timely 24 Objection to the Findings and Recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de 26 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 27 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 4, 2011, is adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to order Pleasant Valley State Prison to release his 4 5 6 7 property, filed June 28, 2011, is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 December 23, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.