Rodriguez v. United States of America
Filing
6
ORDER re Continuance of Mandatory Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 4/20/2010 is continued to 7/14/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/31/2010. (Timken, A)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
CHRISTOPHER C. WATTERS, ESQ. - 253853
LAW OFFICES OF
( S P A C E B E L O W FO R FILIN G ST A M P O N L Y )
MILES, SEARS & EANNI
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2844 FRESNO STREET P.O. BOX 1432 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93716 TELEPHONE (559) 486-5200
A tto r n e ys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA *** GRACIE RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ) DOE 1 THROUGH DOE 100, ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________) NO. 1:10-CV-00089-AWI-DLB ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: IT HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That Defendant, United States of America, be granted an They were served
additional 30 days to file responsive pleadings.
on February 16, 2010, and responsive pleadings would now be due by May 17, 2010. 2. That the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently
scheduled for April 20, 2010, be continued to July 14, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9; ///// /////
1 0 c v 8 9 . o . S t i p Cont.wpd
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in
3.
That the Joint Scheduling Report be due on July 7, 2010, with the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling
accordance
Conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a
March 31, 2010
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
L A W O F F IC E S O F
MILES, SEARS & EANNI
A P R O F E S S IO N A L C O R P O R A T IO N 2844 FR ESN O ST R EET P O S T O F F IC E B O X 1 4 3 2 F R E S N O , C A L IF O R N IA 9 3 7 1 6
-21 0 c v 8 9 . o . S t i p Cont.wpd
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
