Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/15/2011. (Reply Due by : 7/7/2011) (Figueroa, O)
1
2
3
BARBARA M. RIZZO (CSBN 172999)
Attorney At Law
P. O. Box 15
Moss Beach, CA 94038
Telephone: 650-728-0170
Fax: 650-745-1220
4
Attorney for Plaintiff Paul A. Diaz
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
FRESNO DIVISION
9
10
____________________________________
11
PAUL A. DIAZ,
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social
)
Security
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: CV-10-00034 DLB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties,
subject to the approval of the Court, that the Plaintiff, Paul A. Diaz, have
a 14-day extension of time in which to file a Reply to the Defendant
Commissioner’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees, up to and
including July 7, 2011.
This extension is being sought because the
undersigned counsel for the Plaintiff will be on a two-week vacation
beginning June 12 through June 26.
In keeping with the initial scheduling
order in this Social Security case, Plaintiff’s Reply to the Defendant’s
Opposition is due 14 days after service of the Opposition.
Defendant filed
the Opposition on June 6; therefore, Plaintiff’s Reply is due on June 23,
2011.
Given that the due date for Plaintiff’s Reply falls on a day when
counsel for the Plaintiff will be out of the office and out of the country,
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION
CV-10-00034 DLB
1
1
Counsel will be unable to complete the Plaintiff’s Reply by the original June
2
23 due date.
3
approve this stipulation for a 14-day extension of time for Plaintiff to
4
Reply to the Defendant’s Opposition until July 7, 2011.
5
extension of time that Plaintiff has requested in this case.
Plaintiff therefore respectfully requests that the Court
This is the first
6
Respectfully submitted,
7
Dated:
June 8, 2011
Dated:
June 8, 2011
“/s/ Elizabeth Firer”
(As authorized via e-mail)
ELIZABETH FIRER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
8
9
10
By:
11
“/s/ Barbara M. Rizzo”
BARBARA M. RIZZO
Attorney for Plaintiff
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff, Paul A. Diaz, shall
15
have up to and including July 7, 2011, to file a Reply to the Defendant’s
16
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees.
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
June 15, 2011
21
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
22
L. Beck
3b142a
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION
CV-10-00034 DLB
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?