Williams v. Rodriguez et al
Filing
16
ORDER disregarding 15 Motion to amend as moot signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/13/2010. (Lundstrom, T)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LONNIE WILLIAMS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, JR., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Lonnie Williams ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the original complaint on October 27, 2009. (Doc. 1.) On November 16, 2009, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (Doc. 5.) On March 1, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to file a second amended complaint. (Doc. 10.) On May 3, 2010, the court issued an order granting Plaintiff's motion to amend and granting him thirty days in which to file a second amended complaint. (Doc. 14.) On May 11, 2010, Plaintiff filed another motion to file a second amended complaint. (Doc. 15.) Because the court's May 3, 2010 order granted Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint within thirty days of May 3, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint, filed May 11, 2010, is DISREGARDED as moot. ORDER DISREGARDING MOTION TO AMEND AS MOOT (Doc. 15.) 1:09-cv-01882-LJO-GSA-PC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2010
/s/ Gary S. Austin
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
6i0kij
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
