Walker v. Fresno Police Department et al
Filing
47
ORDER that Defendants supplement the motion to compel signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/14/2011. Defendants shall have two (2) days from the date of this order to supplement their motion by filing a copy of the discovery requests and the applicable proofs of service.(Timken, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
HAROLD WALKER,
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-1667-OWW-SKO
Plaintiff,
10
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS
SUPPLEMENT THE MOTION TO
COMPEL
v.
11
12
CITY OF FRESNO, et. al.,
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
On February 28, 2011, Defendants propounded discovery on Plaintiff requesting responses
17
to Interrogatories, Admissions, and Production of Documents. (Doc. 46-1, 2-3.) Plaintiff provided
18
responses to Defendants' Interrogatories, but not to Defendants' requests for Admissions or the
19
request for Production of Documents. (Doc. 46-1, 3; Doc. 46-2, 2.) Defendants have moved to
20
compel a response to the requests for Admissions and for Production of Documents, but Defendants
21
have failed to attach to their motion the proof of service of the discovery requests or a copy of the
22
discovery requests to which they seek to compel a response.
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants shall have two (2) days from
24
the date of this order to supplement their motion by filing a copy of the discovery requests and the
25
applicable proofs of service.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated:
ie14hj
28
June 14, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
