Flores et al v. Genasci et al
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/2/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
<![CDATA[
1
8
Stan S. Mallison, (SBN 184191)
Hector R. Martinez (SBN 206336)
Marco A. Palau (SBN 242340)
Jessica Juarez (SBN 269600)
Joseph Sutton (SBN 269951)
MALLISON & MARTINEZ
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 832-9999
Facsimile: (510) 832-1101
stanm@TheMMLawFirm.com
hectorm@TheMMLawFirm.com
mpalau@TheMMLawFirm.com
9
Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
13
14
15
RIGOBERTO FLORES, JUAN FLORES, ELADIO Case No. 1:09-cv-01618-AWI-GSA
FLORES and JOEL VERDUGO on behalf of
themselves, the State of California and all current
Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
and former employees of DEFENDANTS,
16
17
Plaintiffs,
vs.
18
19
20
EDWIN GENASCI, GENASCI RANCH, LP and
GENASCI DAIRY, INC., A California
Corporation,
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties named herein, through their
respective counsel, that:
26
27
28
29
30
Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
Case No. 1:09-cv-01618-AWI-GSA
1
2
3
The parties have executed a settlement agreement resolving all claims of all parties in the
case. Pursuant to FCRP 41, it is hereby stipulated that the above entitled action be dismissed with
prejudice. Each party to bear their costs except as provided by the settlement agreement.
4
As part of the settlement, Defendants have agreed to pay plaintiffs a negotiated gross sum to
5
6
resolve this matter, and have agreed not to oppose approval of the settlement. The settlement gives
7
Plaintiffs sole discretion to allocate distribution to all of those who may be entitled to a portion of
8
the amount paid, including but not limited to the California Workforce Development Agency.
9
Plaintiffs have determined that a payment of $1900 from the settlement funds is to be paid to the
10
11
California Labor & Workforce Development Agency. A condition of the settlement and this
dismissal is that this court approve this payment.
12
Defendants do not oppose approval of this settlement.
13
14
15
16
Dated: May 24, 2011
17
MALLISON & MARTINEZ
/s/ Marco A. Palau
Marco A. Palau
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18
19
20
Dated: May 24, 2011
21
22
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD
WAYTE & CARRUTH
/s/Anthony Raimondo
Attorneys for Defendant
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
Case No. 1:09-cv-01618-AWI-GSA
1
2
ORDER
3
4
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause shown, the Court hereby ORDERS as
follows:
5
6
1.
The Court dismisses all claims with prejudice;
7
2.
The Court approves the payment of $1900 payment to the California Labor &
8
Workforce Development Agency;
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Dated: June 2, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
DEAC_Signature-END:
0m8i788
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Stipulation and Order of Dismissal
Case No. 1:09-cv-01618-AWI-GSA
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
