Horton v. Sierra Conservation Center et al, No. 1:2009cv01441 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER Denying 12 Motion for Default Judgment signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 03/31/2010. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
Horton v. Sierra Conservation Center et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOHN D. HORTON, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01441-AWI-SMS v. SIERRA CONSERVATION CENTER, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 Defendant. 15 (Docs. 12 & 13) / 16 Plaintiff John D. Horton moved for default judgment against Defendant Sierra Conservation 17 Center, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on February 12, 2010 (Doc. 12). 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) 19 and Local Rule 302. Noting that Plaintiff was unable to state the date of service since the U.S. 20 Marshal’s Affidavit of Service had not yet been returned and that Defendant had filed its answer on 21 the same date that Plaintiff moved for default judgment, on March 1, 2010, the Magistrate Judge 22 recommended that Plaintiff’s motion be denied (Doc. 13). 23 The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the 24 parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. 25 No party has filed objections. 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 2 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 3 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed March 1, 2010, are adopted in full; 6 2. Plaintiff John D. Horton’s motion for default judgment (Doc. 12) is DENIED; and 7 3. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for the resolution of other 8 pending motions. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: 0m8i78 March 31, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.