Criego vs. County of Fresno, et al.
Filing
54
ORDER On 30 Motions In Limine, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/21/2011. (Gaumnitz, R)
<![CDATA[
1
Rayma Church, No. 154897
LAW OFFICES OF
2
EMERSON, COREY, SORENSEN,
CHURCH & LIBKE
3
2520 WEST SHAW LANE, SUITE 102
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93711-2765
Telephone: (559) 432-7641
Facsimile: (559) 432-7639
4
5
rchurch@lawecs.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Franz Criego
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE
vs.
12
13
Case No.: 1:09-cv-01287-OWW-SMS
FRANZ CRIEGO
COUNTY OF FRESNO, KENNETH
TANIGUICHI,
14
Defendants.
TRIAL DATE: June 21, 2011
15
16
The motions in limine of the Plaintiff came on for hearing June 3, 2011 before the
17
Honorable Oliver W. Wanger. Rayma Church appearing on behalf of Plaintiff and Michael
18
G. Woods appearing on behalf of Defendants. The following rulings were made:
State Bar Action: Plaintiff’s motion to exclude all evidence relating to the State Bar
19
1.
20
disciplinary action is denied. Defendants may inquire of Plaintiff whether he is a licensed
21
practicing attorney in California; whether there has been any action taken against his
22
license. Defendant may inquire of Plaintiff whether it was for intentionally making a false
23
report to a law enforcement agency regarding the alleged driving under the influence by
24
another lawyer, but may not introduce evidence relating to the underlying facts and
25
circumstances, unless Plaintiff should deny it.
26
2.
27
granted.
28
///
Media Accounts: Plaintiff’s motion to exclude media accounts relating to Plaintiff is
Complaint for Damages; Demand for Jury Trial
Page 1
Motor Vehicle Accident: Plaintiff’s motion to exclude evidence relating to Plaintiff’s
1
3.
2
involvement in a vehicle collision is granted.
3
4.
4
email sent in February 2008 is granted.
5
5.
6
is granted without prejudice subject to introduction of a related matter by Plaintiff or as a
7
matter of impeachment.
8
6.
9
leave is denied without prejudice.
Anonymous Email: Plaintiff’s motion to exclude evidence relating to an anonymous
Union Activity Email: Plaintiff’s motion to exclude emails relating to union activity
Sick Leave: Plaintiff’s motion to exclude evidence relating to Plaintiff’s use of sick
Pre-2008 Acts, Conduct, etc: Plaintiff’s motion to exclude pre-2008 conduct is
10
7.
11
denied. Counsel are to give notice of any historical evidence.
12
8.
13
parties and a trial assistant may be present in the courtroom.
14
ordered not to discuss each other’s testimony during the trial.
15
9.
16
limine is granted.
Exclusion of Witnesses: Plaintiff’s motion to exclude witnesses is granted. The
Further, witnesses are
Motions in Limine: Plaintiff’s motion to exclude reference to the filing of motions in
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
19
June 21, 2011
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC _Signature- END:
20
21
emm0d64h
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Complaint for Damages; Demand for Jury Trial
Page 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
