Wyatt v. Chapman et al
Filing
21
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, THIRTY DAY DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/6/11. (Hellings, J)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DAVID ALAN WYATT,
10
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01242-SMS PC
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ZANCHI, et al.,
13
(ECF No. 19)
Defendants.
THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
/
14
15
Plaintiff David Alan Wyatt (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on
17
Plaintiff’s complaint, filed July 17, 2009, against Defendants Zanchi and Jones for retaliation in
18
violation of the First Amendment. On May 2, 2011, Defendants filed a motion for summary
19
judgment. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local
20
Rule 230(l).
21
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1.
Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’
23
motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days from the date of service of
24
this order; and
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2.
2
result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
3
4
The failure to respond to Defendants’ motion in compliance with this order will
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411
June 6, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
