(PC)Prophet v. Clark et al, No. 1:2009cv01066 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and DIRECTING Plaintiff to Pay the Filing Fee signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/28/2010. Filing Fee Due by 6/30/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Prophet v. Clark et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 JOSEPH DANNY PROPHET, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KEN CLARK, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) NO. 1:09 CV 01066 OWW MJS PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Document # 5 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 19 302. 20 On April 13,2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 21 plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 22 Plaintiff has suffered three dismissals on the ground of frivolousness or failure to state a claim 23 upon which relief can ge granted. The Magistrate Judge found that plaintiff failed to allege facts 24 that satisfied the imminent danger standard set forth in § 1915(g). Plaintiff was provided an 25 opportunity to file objections within thirty days. On May 19, 2010, Plaintiff filed objections to 26 the findings and recommendations. 27 In his objections, plaintiff continues the line of argument he made earlier that he is 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 indigent and can not afford the filing fee. Plaintiff attaches as exhibits to his objections copies of 2 inmate grievances related to the allegations in the complaint. The complaint in this action alleges 3 that plaintiff was denied adequate access to the law library. Plaintiff has not made any argument, 4 nor made any allegation in the complaint that he is in imminent danger of physical injury. The 5 application to proceed in forma pauperis should therefore be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 6 1915(g). 7 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this 8 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 9 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 10 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 11 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 13, 12 13 14 15 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis status is denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. Plaintiff is directed to submit, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, 16 the $350 filing fee for this case. Plaintiff’s failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action 17 pursuant to Local Rule 110 for failure to obey a court order. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: May 28, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
