Van Horn v. The Glidden Company et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue trial and other related date by 90 days signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/30/2010. (Kusamura, W)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Dana L. Peterson (State Bar No.: 178499) Laura J. Maechtlen (State Bar No.: 224923) 560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 Attorneys for Defendant AKZO NOBEL PAINTS LLC (erroneously named as "The Glidden Company"). W.J. SMITH AND ASSOCIATES William J. Smith (State Bar No.: 056116) Shelley G. Bryant (State Bar No.: 222925) Amanda B. Newell (State Bar No.: 251160) 2350 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 132 Fresno, California 93711 Telephone: (559) 432-0986 Facsimile: (559) 432-4871 Attorneys for Plaintiff KEVIN R. VAN HORN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KEVIN R. VAN HORN, Plaintiff, v. THE GLIDDEN COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1-20, Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 1:09-cv-01040-OWW-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND OTHER RELATED DATE BY 90-DAYS Trial Date: September 28, 2010
The parties to the above-captioned matter hereby request and stipulate to a continuance of the trial date in this case. Good cause exists for the continuance requested by the parties as set forth below:
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND OTHER RELATED DATES Case No. 1:09-cv-01040-OWW-GSA
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1. 2.
The current trial date is September 28, 2010. The parties are actively engaged in settlement negotiations. The parties desire
additional time to attempt to informally negotiate a settlement in advance of a mediation, which is currently set for April 14. 3. A continuance of the trial and other related dates by 90-days or more will allow
the parties to further engage in settlement negotiations, and conduct mediation, prior to engaging in substantial additional discovery that is costly. This will allow the parties to direct resources toward mediation, instead of expert discovery. 4. The parties request a 90-day extension of all pre-trial dates and the trial date. The
parties tentatively propose the following schedule, subject to the court's availability: Expert Disclosure: Rebuttal/Supplemental Expert Disclosures: Discovery cut-off: Non-dispositive motion: Dispositive motion: Settlement Conference: Pretrial Conference: Trial Date: 5. continuance. DATED: March 26, 2010 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP July 14, 2010 August 12, 2010 August 30, 2010 September 13, 2010 September 29, 2010 September 15, 2010 November 29, 2010 January 17, 2011
None of the parties will suffer any hardship as a result of the requested
By:
Laura J. Maechtlen Attorneys for Defendant AKZO NOBEL PAINTS LLC.
/s/
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND OTHER RELATED DATES Case No. 1:09-cv-01040-OWW-GSA PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED: March 26, 2010
W.J. SMITH & ASSOCIATES
By:
Shelley G. Bryant Attorneys for Plaintiff KEVIN R. VAN HORN. ORDER Having considered the parties Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Trial and Other Related Dates, the Court adopts the dates set forth in the Stipulation as follows: Expert Disclosure: Rebuttal/Supplemental Expert Disclosures: Discovery cut-off: Non-dispositive motion: Dispositive motion: Settlement Conference: Pretrial Conference: Trial Date: IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 30, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE July 14, 2010 August 12, 2010 August 30, 2010 September 13, 2010 September 29, 2010 September 15, 2010 November 29, 2010, 11:00 a.m., Ctrm. 3 January 18, 2011, 8:30 a.m., Ctrm. 3
/s/
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND OTHER RELATED DATES Case No. 1:09-cv-01040-OWW-GSA PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
