(PC) Burnett v. St. Clair et al, No. 1:2009cv00829 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER Granting Motion For Relief From Final Judgment (Doc. 11 ), ORDER Vacating Court's June 17, 2010 Order And Judgment (Docs. 9 , 10 ), Action Dismissed Pursuant To Plaintiff's Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/4/2010. (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
(PC) Burnett v. St. Clair et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ESTER BURNETT, 10 11 CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00829-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM FINAL JUDGMENT (DOC. 11) v. ORDER VACATING COURT’S JUNE 17, 2010 ORDER AND JUDGMENT (DOCS. 9, 10) 12 JACK ST. CLAIR, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 / ACTION DISMISSED PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 15 16 Plaintiff Ester Burnett (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 17 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). This action was dismissed on June 17, 18 2010 for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. On August 2, 2010, Plaintiff 19 filed a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). (Pl.’s 20 Mot., Doc. 11.) Plaintiff contends he is entitled to relief by reason of mistake, inadvertence, 21 surprise, or excusable neglect. Plaintiff contends that on November 5, 2009, he submitted a 22 motion to voluntarily dismiss this action. Plaintiff thus seeks to avoid accruing a strike pursuant 23 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 24 Plaintiff submits a CDC-119, Special Purposes Letters form, labeled as Exhibit A. 25 Plaintiff also contends that he submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate 26 filing, Case No. 2:10-CV-01088-EFB, and included his motion to dismiss with that filing. Case 27 No. 2:10-CV-01088-EFB was filed in the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of 28 California, and later transferred to the Fresno Division as case No. 1:10-CV-00822-SMS. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The Court finds sufficient evidence to support Plaintiff’s motion for relief. Having 2 examined case No. 1:10-CV-00822-SMS, the Court finds that Plaintiff did attach his motion to 3 voluntarily dismiss in the other action. That motion to voluntarily dismiss was never received in 4 this action. Prior to Plaintiff’s August 2, 2010 motion, the record shows Plaintiff’s notice of 5 change of address to Pleasant Valley State Prison on September 30, 2009.1 However, it appears 6 to be inadvertence on the part of the mailing system that the Court did not receive the motion to 7 voluntarily dismiss, and not on the part of Plaintiff. 8 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), an action may be dismissed by 9 plaintiff by filing a notice of dismissal before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a 10 motion for summary judgment. None of the defendants named in this action have filed an 11 answer or other responsive pleading. 12 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that 13 1. Plaintiff’s motion for relief from a final judgment, filed August 2, 2010, is 14 GRANTED; 15 2. The Court’s June 17, 2010 Order and Judgment are VACATED; 16 3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), this action is voluntarily 17 18 19 DISMISSED, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close the file in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a August 4, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at High Desert State Prison. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.