(PC) Brown v. Williams et al, No. 1:2009cv00792 - Document 31 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER Denying As Moot Plaintiff's Motion To Compel (Doc. 24 ), ORDER Directing Clerk's Office To Resend Findings And Recommendations To New Address On File (Docs. 27 , 29 ), ORDER Granting In Part Plaintiff's Motion To Extend Time To Respond To 12(b) Motion, 30-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 11/25/2010. (Fahrney, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Brown v. Williams et al Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 THORNELL BROWN, 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, v. R. J. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. 14 15 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00792-LJO-GBC (PC) ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Doc. 24) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO R ES END FIND INGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO NEW ADDRESS ON FILE (Docs. 27, 29) ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 12(b) MOTION (Doc. 30) 16 17 / 30-DAY DEADLINE 18 19 Plaintiff Thornell Brown (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 9, 2010, Plaintiff filed a 21 motion to compel the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department to allow Plaintiff to obtain his pro se 22 legal materials. On September 17, 2010 Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address and since then, 23 documents sent to the Plaintiff have been returned. On November 4, 2010, Plaintiff filed a notice 24 to the Court from the new address on file that he has received the legal materials that he will need 25 to oppose the motion to dismiss and Plaintiff requests a forty-five (45) day extension to file an 26 opposition to the motion to dismiss. 27 Based on Plaintiff’s November 4, notice of receiving legal materials necessary to proceed in 28 this action, Plaintiff’s motion to compel filed on July 9, 2010 is DENIED as moot. Moreover, the 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Court DIRECTS the Clerk’s office to resend the September 1, 2010 Findings and Recommendations 2 to the new address on file for the Plaintiff. Given that good cause has been presented to the court, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 Plaintiff’s request is GRANTED IN PART and Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date 5 of service of this order in which to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: 612e7d November 25, 2010 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
