Stamas, et al vs. County of Madera, et al.
Filing
64
STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint (by County of Madera & Board of Supervisors of The Co. of Madera) and ORDER: response extended to 3/5/2010. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Hearing is continued from 3/15/2010 to Monday, Apr il 19, 2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SMS) before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder. Further Ordered that document 61 is Stricken (parties had the date of response 7/1/2009), since parties resubmitted Stipulation and Proposed Order entry 62 . signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/2/2010. (Herman, H)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Andrew W. Sorensen, No. 078266 Ryan D. Libke, No. 193742 EMERSON, COREY, SORENSEN, CHURCH & LIBKE
2520 WEST SHAW LANE, SUITE 102 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93711-2765 Telephone: (559) 432-7641 Facsimile: (559) 432-7639 LAW OFFICES OF
Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARK STAMAS and JUDY CASTLES, Plaintiffs, vs. COUNTY OF MADERA; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA; DAVID HERMAN, an individual; SHAWN HUSTON, an individual; DAVID PRENTICE, an individual; GERALD HOUSTON and LINDA BARLOW, husband and wife; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants.
COMPLAINT FILED: May 27, 2009
Case No.: 1:09-CV-00753-LJO-SMS STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, that due to the complexity of the Second Amended Complaint filed in this matter, the time for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA to respond be continued 14 days, to and including March 5, 2010. DATED: February 11, 2010 GRISWOLD, LaSALLE, COBB, DOWD & GIN, LLP By /s/ Robert M. Dowd Robert M. Dowd Attorneys for Plaintiffs, MARK STAMAS and JUDY CASTLES
Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint and Order Page 1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:
DATED: February 11, 2010
EMERSON, COREY, SORENSEN, CHURCH & LIBKE By /s/ Andrew W. Sorensen Andrew W. Sorensen Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA ORDER
On the stipulation and agreement of the parties through their attorneys of record and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Defendants, COUNTY OF MADERA and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MADERA to respond be continued 14 days, to and including March 5, 2010. The Court hereby continues the Scheduling Conference hearing from March 15, 2010 to April 19, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. before Judge Snyder in Courtroom #7. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED THAT document #61 has response date due as July 1, 2009 is STRICKEN, since parties resubmitted the document in entry #62.
March 2, 2010
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder_____________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint and Order Page 2
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
