Villegas v. Schulteis et al
Filing
83
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not be Dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/28/11. Show Cause Response deadline: 10 Days.(Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
SANTOS A. VILLEGAS,
13
14
1:09-cv-00493-AWI-SMS PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
v.
(ECF No. 72)
15
L. L. SCHULTEIS, et. al.,
TEN-DAY DEADLINE
16
Defendants.
17
/
18
19
Santos A. Villegas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
20
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the first
21
amended complaint filed on August 24, 2009, against Defendants Rodriguez, Zucker, Soto,
22
Martinez, Knight, Schulteiss, and Carrasco. This matter is set for jury trial on September 7, 2011.
23
On April 6, 2011, the Court issued a scheduling order requiring Plaintiff to file a pretrial
24
statement on or before May 27, 2011. Plaintiff failed to comply with or otherwise respond to the
25
order. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
Within ten (10) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause
27
why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the
28
Court’s order; and
1
1
2.
2
The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action, with
prejudice.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
icido3
June 28, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?