Thomas v. Robles et al
Filing
87
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Serve 86 Letter From Rudolph Medina on Plaintiff; ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Inform the Court Whether to transport Rudolph Medina for Trial, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/30/11. Five-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LARRY D. THOMAS,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
HECTOR ROBLES, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00443-LJO-BAM PC
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
SERVE LETTER FROM RUDOLPH MEDINA
ON PLAINTIFF
(ECF No. )
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO INFORM
THE COURT WHETHER TO TRANSPORT
RUDOLPH MEDINA FOR TRIAL
/ FIVE-DAY DEADLINE
16
17
Plaintiff Larry D. Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is confirmed for trial
19
on December 13, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O’Neill. On November 11,
20
2011, an order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued to transport witness Rudolph
21
Medina for trial. On November 28, 2011, the Court received a letter from inmate Medina stating that
22
he refuses to testify in this matter. Since Plaintiff requested the attendance of inmate Medina he shall
23
notify the Court if he wants inmate Medina to appear for trial given that he has indicated he will
24
refuse to testify.
25
Accordingly it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
27
28
The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the letter filed November 28, 2011, on
Plaintiff; and
///
1
1
2.
2
3
4
Within five days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall inform the
Court if he wants inmate Medina transported to testify on his behalf at trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411
November 30, 2011
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
