Gray v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/9/2010. ( Response due by 4/7/2010)(Figueroa, O)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER Acting United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8938 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Theophous.Reagans@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
EDWARD W. GRAY,
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________)
CIVIL NO. 1:09-00379-GSA STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that defendant's time to respond to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be extended from March 8, 2010 to April 7, 2010. This is the defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The defendant needs an extension because counsel is still evaluating the defensibility of the Commissioner's decision.
/// ///
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i70h38
Respectfully submitted this 8th day of March 2010. DATED: March 10, 2010 By: /s/ Ann M. Cerney (As agreed via telephone) ANN M. CERNEY Attorney at Law Attorney for Plaintiff
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DATED: March 10, 2010 By: /s/ Theophous H. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
March 9, 2010
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
