(PC) Briones v. Hedgpeth et al, No. 1:2008cv01987 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING in FULL the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING Action With Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim Under Section 1983 and DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Enter Judgment 10 , 11 ; ORDER Counting Dismissal as a STRIKE Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G), signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/14/11. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
(PC) Briones v. Hedgpeth et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JESUS C. BRIONES, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01987-OWW-SMS PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER SECTION 1983, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, et al., 13 Defendants. (Docs. 10 and 11) 14 ORDER COUNTING DISMISSAL AS A STRIKE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G) 15 / 16 17 Plaintiff Jesus C. Briones, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 31, 2008. The matter was referred to 19 a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 14, 2011, a Findings and Recommendations was filed in which the Magistrate 21 Judge screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and recommended dismissal of the action for 22 failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff was notified that his Objection, if any, was due 23 within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file an Objection or otherwise respond to the Findings and 24 Recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 26 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 27 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 The Court adopts the Findings and Recommendations filed on January 14, 2011, in full; 2. 5 This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim under section 1983; 6 3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment against Plaintiff; and 7 4. This dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 14, 2011 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.