Huerta v. Mims
Filing
19
ORDER Requiring Appointed Counsel to File Status of the Cse Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 11/07/2011.(30) Day Deadline (This order served on Julius M. Cruz, Esq., Sawl Law Group, 2150 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721 vis USPS and electronicly) (Martin-Gill, S)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
JOE DANNY HUERTA,
14
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-01889-LJO-GBC (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING APPOINTED COUNSEL
TO FILE STATUS OF THE CASE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
v.
15
MARGARET MIMMS, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
/
18
Plaintiff filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on
19
Plaintiff’s original complaint filed December 9, 2008. Doc. 1.
20
On June 21, 2011, the Court appointed counsel for Plaintiff for the limited purpose of
21
assisting Plaintiff in identifying the Doe Defendants and filing a complaint, or an amended
22
complaint, if necessary. The Court appointed Julius M. Cruz, Esq., from the Court’s pro bono
23
attorney panel to represent Plaintiff. The Court ordered Mr. Cruz to file a notice of association of
24
counsel within thirty days of the June 21, 2011 order and ordered Mr. Cruz to provide the Court with
25
additional information identifying the Doe Defendants, and file a complaint, or an amended
26
complaint, if necessary, within ninety days of the June 21, 2011 order. To date, Mr. Cruz has not
27
complied with the order.
28
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
Julius M. Cruz, Esq., has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in
which to provide the Court with a status of the case; and
4
2.
5
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Julius M. Cruz,
Esq., Sawl Law Group, 2150 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
0jh02o
November 7, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
