(PC) Manthei v. Alvarez et al, No. 1:2008cv01727 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this 1 Action be Dismissed, with Prejudice, for Failure to Comply and for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief may be Granted; Objections, if any, Due within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/7/2010. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 2/9/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Manthei v. Alvarez et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KENNETH D. MANTHEI, 11 1:08-cv-01727-AWI-GSA-PC Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (Doc. 1.) ALVAREZ, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 / OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 16 17 Plaintiff Kenneth D. Manthei (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on November 10, 2008. 19 (Doc. 1.) On November 10, 2009, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state 20 a claim upon which relief may be granted and gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint 21 within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). (Doc. 8.) To date, Plaintiff has not 22 complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file 23 which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. 24 25 26 Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the undersigned HEREBY RECOMMENDS that: 1. This action be dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with 27 the court's order and Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be 28 granted under section 1983; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. The Clerk be DIRECTED to close this case. 2 These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) 4 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 5 objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 6 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 7 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 8 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij January 7, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
