Cramer v. Target Corporation et al, No. 1:2008cv01693 - Document 90 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS That Defendant Barrios' Motion To Dismiss Be Denied (Docket Nos. 59 , 82 ), signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/1/2010. (Scrivner, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cramer v. Target Corporation et al Doc. 90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 MATTHEW B. CRAMER, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01693-OWW-SKO 13 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANT BARRIOS' MOTION TO DISMISS BE DENIED Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 Docket Nos. 59, 82 TARGET CORPORATION, et al., 17 18 Defendants. / 19 20 On June 3, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 21 Defendant Barrios' Motion to Dismiss be DENIED. These Findings and Recommendations were 22 served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be 23 filed within twenty (20) days after service of the order. No objections were filed. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 25 a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that 26 the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper 27 analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 The Findings and Recommendations issued June 3, 2010, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Defendant Barrios' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: July 1, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
