Fagan v. Fresno County Jail, et al.
Filing
27
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why this Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Obey a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 05/17/2010. Show Cause Response due by 6/21/2010. (Flores, E)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 TINSLEY FAGAN, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 FRESNO COUNTY JAIL, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 / 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 77e0d6 25 26 27 28 1 Order Plaintiff Tinsley Fagan ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 12, 2010, Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint was granted. (Doc. 24.) Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days from the date of service of the order. More than thirty days have elapsed, and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. If Plaintiff fails to show cause, the Court will dismiss this action for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS (Doc. 24) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01674-DLB PC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 17, 2010
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
