Cohea v. Adams et al
Filing
65
ORDER Granting Defendants' 62 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 06/01/2011. Dispositive Motions filed by 9/6/2011.(Flores, E)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DANNY JAMES COHEA,
10
11
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01186-LJO-SMS PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
(ECF No. 62)
12
D. ADAMS, et al.,
NINETY-DAY DEADLINE
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff Danny James Cohea, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
16
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 13, 2008. On May 31, 2011,
17
Defendants Adams, Jones, and Vela-Lopez filed a motion to amend the scheduling order to extend
18
time to file dispositive motions and Defendant Kush filed an answer to the complaint. Additionally,
19
Defendants notified the Court that a subpoena was served on an L. Hicenbothem, however this
20
individual did not work at Corcoran during the time period alleged in the complaint. By separate
21
order the Court will require Plaintiff to provide additional information identifying the defendant to
22
be served so that a fourth attempt can be made to effect service.
23
On January 31, 2011, an order issued modifying the scheduling order and dispositive motions
24
were due by May 31, 2011. Currently, there is still one defendant to be identified and served. Since
25
an answer was filed on may 31, 2011, scheduling order will issue setting additional dates for
26
Defendant Kush. Therefore, Plaintiff will not suffer any prejudice from granting Defendants request.
27
Accordingly, good cause having been found, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s
28
motion to amend the scheduling order shall be GRANTED and Defendants Adams, Jones, and Vela1
1
Lopez shall have ninety (90) days of the date of service of this order to file dispositive motions.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411
June 1, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
