Gamez v. Gonzalez, et al.
Filing
89
ORDER Setting Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Lewis on 6/29/11. Telephonic Status Conference set for 7/8/2011 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Peter C. Lewis. (Verduzco, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
SERGIO ALEJANDRO GAMEZ,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 08cv1113 MJL (PCL)
ORDER SETTING STATUS
Plaintiff, CONFERENCE
v.
(Doc. 70.)
F. GONZALES, et al.
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff Gamez, a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, is prosecuting an action
24 filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 16, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment
25 against two Defendants, K.S. Allen and S. Wright, both of whom answered the complaint, but
26 neither of whom have responded to any discovery requests. (Doc. 70.) The District Court construed
27 Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment as a Motion for Discovery Sanctions pursuant to Federal
28 Rule of Civil Procedure 37(d) and referred the Motion to this Court for an order pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) or if this Court determines that
1 entry of Default is appropriate, for a report and recommendation pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
2 Procedure 72(b). (Doc. 77.) Defense Counsel filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Default
3 Judgment on May 25, 2011. (Doc. 80.)
4
After a review of the record, and good cause appearing, the Court Orders the parties to appear
5 for a telephonic Status Conference on July 8, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. Defense counsel shall initiate the
6 conference call to the Chambers’ Conference Line at (760) 353-4227.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: June 29, 2011
11
Peter C. Lewis
U.S. Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
08cv1113 MJL (PCL)
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
