Exmundo v. Kane et al
Filing
55
ORDER GRANTING Defendants Leave to Supplement Motion for Summary Judgment; Supplemental Motion, if any, Due within Fourteen Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/8/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
EMELITO EXMUNDO,
9
CASE NO. 1:08-CV-00822-DLB PC
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS LEAVE
TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
R. KANE, et al.,
12
(DOC. 43)
Defendants.
13
SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION, IF ANY, DUE
WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS
/
14
15
Plaintiff Emelito Exmundo (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
16
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this
17
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants R.
18
Kane and A. Ross for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, deliberate indifference to a
19
serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and the California Constitution. See
20
August 20, 2009 Order, Doc. 10; October 14, 2009 Order, Doc. 16.
21
On May 23, 2011, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Doc. 43.
22
Defendants address only the retaliations claims, not Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim. In the
23
interest of judicial economy, the Court will provide Defendants with fourteen (14) days to
24
supplement their motion, addressing Plaintiff’s other claims. Plaintiff will be provided an
25
opportunity to oppose Defendants’ supplemental motion, and Defendants may file a reply.
26
Requests for extensions of time are disfavored without a showing of good cause.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Defendants are granted fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order in
3
which to supplement their motion for summary judgment, addressing Plaintiff’s
4
Eighth Amendment claim and the California Constitution claim;
5
2.
6
7
supplemental motion in which to file his opposition; and
3.
8
9
10
Plaintiff is granted twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of Defendants’
Defendants are granted seven (7) days from the date of service of Plaintiff’s
opposition in which to file their reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3b142a
November 8, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?