(PC) Dorrough v. Gonzalez et al, No. 1:2008cv00634 - Document 30 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS And Dismissing Certain Claims And Defendants (Doc. 21 ), signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/31/2010. (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
(PC) Dorrough v. Gonzalez et al Doc. 30 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MICHAEL REED DORROUGH, 9 10 11 12 13 CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00634-AWI-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS v. F. GONZALES, et al., (Doc. 21) Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Michael Reed Dorrough (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 16 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 17 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 18 On October 14, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein 19 which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the 20 Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection to 21 the Findings and Recommendations on November 2, 2009. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de 23 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 24 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. In the Objection, 25 Plaintiff contends that he believed this court would retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a 26 settlement agreement reached in Dorrough v. Small, et al., 1:89-CV-827 OWW JFM (PC). 27 the extent Plaintiff seeks to have this settlement agreement enforced, Plaintiff’s remedy is to file 28 a motion to enforce the settlement agreement in Dorrough v. Small, et al., 1:89-CV-827 OWW 1 To Dockets.Justia.com 1 JFM (PC) and not file a new action. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 14, 2009, is adopted in full; 4 2. This action proceed against Defendants Gonzales, Carrasco, and McLaughlin for 5 6 retaliation in violation of the First Amendment; and 3. 7 Plaintiff’s claims for violation of due process and violation of state law are dismissed for failure to state a claim. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: 0m8i78 March 31, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.