Hillblom et al v. County of Fresno et al
Filing
74
STIPULATION and ORDER re: Modification of Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/18/2010. Expert Disclosure by by 6/15/2010; Supplemental Expert Disclosure by 6/15/2010; Non-expert Discovery by 8/1/2010; Expert Discovery by 8/1/2010. Note: Any hearing dates, pre-trial or trial dates may only be amended by Judge O'Neill and only upon a showing of good cause. (Herman, H)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Patience Milrod Law Office of Patience Milrod 844 N. Van Ness Avenue Fresno, California 93728 559/442-3111 559/442-3164 fax Attorney for Plaintiffs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
TERRY HILLBLOM, SANDRA HILLBLOM ) and C. MICHAEL L., a minor, by and ) and through his guardians ad litem, TERRY) and SANDRA HILLBLOM, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) COUNTY OF FRESNO; FRESNO COUNTY ) SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; FRESNO ) COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF ROBERT ) CAREY; FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF'S ) SERGEANTS KATHY CARREIRO and ) E. BROUGHTON; and DOES 1 through 50. ) ) Defendants. ) )
No. 1:07-CV-01467 LJO SMS STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER
Plaintiffs TERRY HILLBLOM, SANDRA HILLBLOM and MICHAEL L., by and through his guardians ad litem, TERRY AND SANDRA HILLBLOM ("Plaintiffs") and defendants COUNTY OF FRESNO, RICHARD PIERCE, Stipulation re: Modification of Scheduling Order 1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
ROBERT CAREY, KATHY CARREIRO, and ERIC BROUGHTON ("Defendants") hereby stipulate to the following modification of the current scheduling order. On March 9, 2010 the parties entered into a stipulation to amend the entire scheduling order in order to participate in mediation, expecting the mediation to take place in April. Such a schedule would have allowed the parties sufficient time to take additional depositions, avoiding expenditure of attorneys' fees and costs if the mediation were successful. However, due to conflicting schedules, the mediation could not take place until May 10, 2010; even though this date would not allow time for depositions, the parties held off seeking another amendment of the scheduling order until we learned the outcome of the mediation. The parties unsuccessfully mediated the case on May 10, 2010. They therefore now seek an amended scheduling order so that parties may now take the depositions they had deferred pending mediation. This stipulation does not request an order changing any hearing dates, or the trial date. Therefore, the parties request the Court issue an Order making the following changes to the Scheduling Order in this case: Expert Disclosure: from May 17, 2010 to June 15, 2010 Supplemental Expert Disclosure: from June 7, 2010 to July 15, 2010 Nonexpert Discovery Cutoff: from May 17, 2010 to August 1, 2010 Expert Discovery Cutoff: from July 15, 2010 to August 1, 2010
IT IS SO STIPULATED. Stipulation re: Modification of Scheduling Order 2
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Dated: May 11, 2010 /s/ Patience Milrod PATIENCE MILROD Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: May 11, 2010 Weakley, Arendt & McGuire LLP Attorneys for Defendants /s/ Michael Linden By MICHAEL LINDEN
IT IS SO ORDERED. Note: Any hearing dates, pre-trial or trial dates may only be Amended by Judge O'Neill and only upon a showing of good cause. Dated: 5/18/2000 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder HON. SANDRA SYNDER Judge of the District Court
Stipulation re: Modification of Scheduling Order
3
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
