(PC) Blackman v. Sims et al, No. 1:2007cv01447 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 6 ; ORDER Dismissing Action signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/3/2008. CASE CLOSED.(Esteves, C)

Download PDF
(PC) Blackman v. Sims et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY BLACKMAN, 12 1:07-cv-01447-LJO-GSA-P ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6) Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 RICHARD M. SIMS, et al., ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 15 Defendants. / 16 17 Plaintiff, Tony Blackman (“plaintiff”), is a state prisoner 18 proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 21 Rule 72-302. The matter was referred to a United States 22 On November 28, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings 23 and a Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and 24 which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 25 Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) 26 days. 27 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. 28 // On January 2, 2008, plaintiff filed objections to the 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2 § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a 3 de novo review of this case. 4 entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to 5 be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. 8 Having carefully reviewed the The Findings and Recommendation, filed November 28, 2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and, 9 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on 10 plaintiff’s failure to obey the court’s order of October 9, 2007. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: b9ed48 February 3, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.