(PC) Braley v. Wasco State Prison, et al, No. 1:2007cv01423 - Document 32 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal Of Action (Doc. 27 ), Objections Due Within 30 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/8/2011. F&R's referred to Judge Oliver W. Wanger; Objections to F&R due by 3/14/2011. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
(PC) Braley v. Wasco State Prison, et al Doc. 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 THOMAS D. BRALEY, 10 11 CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01423-OWW-SKO PC Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION v. (Doc. 27) 12 WASCO STATE PRISON, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Thomas D. Braley (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 21, 2010, Plaintiff filed 17 a motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. #27.) 18 Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed for failing to state any claims on August 6, 2009. (Doc. 19 #20.) Plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an 20 amended complaint. Accordingly, there are no pleadings on the docket on which judgment can be 21 granted. The Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be denied. 22 Further, since Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend for failing to state any 23 claims and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, the Court will recommend that this action 24 be dismissed and closed. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir. 1992)(dismissal 25 with prejudice upheld where court had instructed plaintiff regarding deficiencies in prior order 26 dismissing claim with leave to amend). 27 28 Accordingly, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty (30) 3 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written 4 objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 6 shall be served and filed within ten (10) days after service of the objections. The parties are advised 7 that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 8 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: ie14hj February 8, 2011 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.