De Shazo v. Hieng et al
Filing
64
STIPULATION and ORDER of Dismissal of Defendant with Prejudice signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/23/2011. Hieng terminated. (Sant Agata, S)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
STEVEN DE SHAZO,
10
CASE NO. 1:07-cv-1258-AWI-MJS (PC)
Plaintiff,
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
OF DEFENDANT WITH PREJUDICE
v.
(ECF No. 63)
12
C/O HIENG,
13
Defendant.
/
14
15
Defendant TOM P. HIENG, by and through his counsel, NICOLE ROMAN of Andrada &
16
Associates, and Plaintiff, STEVEN L. DESHAZO, by and through his counsel, WILLIAM L.
17
SCHMIDT of the Law Offices of William Schmidt, submit the following Stipulation of Dismissal
18
with Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed
with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).
21
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that each party shall bear its own costs.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Date: October 31, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM SCHMIDT
/s/ William L. Schmidt
By
WILLIAM L. SCHMIDT
Attorney for Plaintiff
STEVEN L. DESHAZO
Dated: October 18, 2011
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
/s/ Nicole Roman
By
NICOLE ROMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
TOM P. HIENG
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Plaintiff STEVEN L. DESHAZO's claims against Defendant TOM P. HIENG are HEREBY
9
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the stipulation between the parties.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
Dated:
0m8i78
November 23, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
