Abarca, et. al. vs. Merck & Co., et.al.
Filing
1316
ORDER GRANTING #1301 Request For Leave to Enlarge Page Limit For Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Phase 1), signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/8/2011. (Gaumnitz, R)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
JOHN F. BARG (State Bar No. 60230; jfb@bcltlaw.com)
STEPHEN C. LEWIS (State Bar No. 66590; scl@bcltlaw.com)
R. MORGAN GILHULY (State Bar No. 133659; rmg@bcltlaw.com)
BARG COFFIN LEWIS & TRAPP, LLP
350 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94104-1435
Telephone: (415) 228-5400
Facsimile: (415) 228-5450
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
TIMOTHY JONES (SBN 119841; tjones@joneshelsley.com)
JONES HELSLEY PC
265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 310
Post Office Box 28340
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone: (559) 233-4800
Facsimile: (559) 233-9330
Attorneys for Defendants Merck & Co., Inc.,
Amsted Industries Incorporated, and
Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
ABARCA, RAUL VALENCIA, et al.,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:07-cv-00388-OWW-DLB
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR
LEAVE TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT
FOR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
(PHASE 1)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (PHASE 1)
Abarca v. Merck & Co. Inc., Case No. 1:07-cv-00388-OWW-DLB
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
856635.1
1
Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of this Court’s Standing Order, the request of Defendants
2
Merck & Co., Inc., Amsted Industries Incorporated, and Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc.
3
(collectively, “Defendants”) for leave to file an enlarged Reply in Support of Defendants’
4
Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Phase 1) in the above-referenced matter, of no
5
more than 13 pages in length, is GRANTED. Defendants’ Reply in Support of
6
Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Phase 1) shall not exceed 13 pages
7
in length, and shall be printed in 13-point font.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
DATED: June 8, 2011
11
/s/ OLIVER W.WANGER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (PHASE 1)
Abarca v. Merck & Co. Inc., Case No. 1:07-cv-00388-OWW-DLB
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
856635.1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
