-GSA (PC)Silvis v. California Department of Corrections et al, No. 1:2007cv00332 - Document 106 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting 103 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER GRANTING Defendants Perry's and Rees' 76 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/22/2011. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
-GSA (PC)Silvis v. California Department of Corrections et al Doc. 106 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN ROBERT SILVIS, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 16 Defendants. _____________________________/ 17 1:07-cv-00332-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 103.) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS PERRY'S AND REES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 76.) John Robert Silvis (“plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 18, 2011, Findings and Recommendations were entered, recommending 21 that Defendants Perry's and Rees' Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on July 26, 2010, be granted. 22 (Doc. 103.) On March 17, 2011, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 23 (Doc. 105.) 24 . In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, 25 this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 26 including Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported 27 by the record and proper analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. 3 The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 18, 2011, are ADOPTED in full; 4 2. 5 Defendants Perry's and Rees' Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on July 26, 2010, is GRANTED; 6 3. 7 This case now PROCEEDS only against Defendants Davis, Pappenfus, Weed, and Smith; and 8 4. 9 The Clerk is DIRECTED to reflect on the Court's docket that defendants Perry and Rees are terminated from this case. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: b9ed48 March 22, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.