Tipaksorn Tungjunyatham v. Mike Johanns
Filing
90
ORDER Denying as Moot Plaintiff's Second Motion for Late Filing of Opposition to Defendant's Bill of Costs 88 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/21/2011. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
TIPAKSORN TUNGJUNYATHAM,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01764-SMS
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S
SECOND MOTION FOR LATE FILING OF
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S BILL OF
COSTS
v.
MIKE JOHANNS, Secretary of the United
States Department of Agriculture,
13
Defendant.
14
(Doc. 88)
/
15
Plaintiff again moves for leave to file opposition to Defendant’s bill of costs, maintaining
16
that she was not aware of Defendant’s motion. This Court has previously denied the same
17
motion (Doc. 84) since, when Defendant submitted the bill, Plaintiff was represented by counsel,
18
the Reich Law Firm, which received notice that Defendant filed the bill of costs. Neither the
19
Court nor Defendant is responsible to notify personally a party who is represented by counsel so
20
long as notice is provided to the party’s attorney of record.
21
After the Court’s denial of her prior motion, Plaintiff filed documentation signed by her prior
22
attorney terminating representation. This termination of representation does not change the fact that
23
Plaintiff was represented by her former attorney when Defendant filed its bill of costs.
24
Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED as moot.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated:
icido3
June 21, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?