Kane v. Pierce
Filing
139
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING 27 CASE signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/4/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
James J. Arendt, Esq. Michael R. Linden, Esq.
Bar No. 142937 Bar No. 192485
WEAKLEY, ARENDT & McGUIRE, LLP 1630 East Shaw Avenue, Suite 176 Fresno, California 93710 Telephone: (559) 221-5256 Facsimile: (559) 221-5262
Attorneys for Defendants MARGARET MIMS, JOSE FLORES, CHARLOTTE TILKES, and RICHARD PIERCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHAUN KANE, ) CASE NO. 1:06-CV-01564-OWW-SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ) STIPULATED DISMISSAL AND ORDER ) v. ) ) ) RICHARD PIERCE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ____________________________________ )
Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff SHAUN KANE, in pro per, and defendants MARGARET MIMS, JOSE FLORES, CHARLOTTE TILKES, and RICHARD PIERCE ("County defendants"), and defendant RUSSELL YORKE ("Federal Defendant"), through their attorneys of record, hereby jointly request and stipulate to dismissal /// /// /// /// /// /// ///
____________________________
S tip u la te d Dismissal and Order
1 2 3 4 5
of the entire action, with prejudice, all parties to bear their own costs and attorney's fees.
DATED: April 15, 2010 By: /s / Shaun Kane Plaintiff Shaun Kane
DATED: April 30, 2010 6 7 8 9 10 11 DATED: April 28, 2010 12 13 14 By: 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 4, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE /s/ Jeffrey J. Lodge Jeffrey J. Lodge Assistant U.S. Attorney for Defendant RUSSELL YORKE BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: /s/ James J. Arendt James J. Arendt Attorney for Defendants MARGARET MIMS, JOSE FLORES, CHARLOTTE TILKES, and RICHARD PIERCE WEAKLEY, ARENDT & McGUIRE LLP
____________________________
S tip u la te d Dismissal and Order
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
