McAllister v. Gunja et al
Filing
52
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Response to Defendants' 50 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 06/23/2011. Response due by 7/11/2011. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JOHN I. McALLISTER,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00082-OWW-SMS PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
PAUL M. SCHULTZ, et al.,
13
(ECF No. 50)
Defendants.
FIFTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
/
14
15
Plaintiff John I. McAllister (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and
16
in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal
17
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971), which provides a remedy for violation of
18
civil rights by federal actors. This action is proceeding on the complaint, filed January 26, 2006,
19
against Defendants Gordon, Martin, McCarty, Schultz, and Brown for violations of the First
20
Amendment. On May 10, 2011, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 50.)
21
Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule
22
230(l).
23
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1.
Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’
25
motion for summary judgment within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of
26
this order; and
27
///
28
///
1
1
2.
2
result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
3
4
The failure to respond to Defendants’ motion in compliance with this order will
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411
June 23, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?